Difference between revisions of "Ridicule"
From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with 'File:lighterstill.jpgright|frame ==Origin== French or Latin; French, from Latin ridiculum jest *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/17th_cent...') |
m (Text replacement - "http://" to "https://") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Origin== | ==Origin== | ||
French or Latin; French, from [[Latin]] ridiculum jest | French or Latin; French, from [[Latin]] ridiculum jest | ||
| − | *[ | + | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/17th_century 1690] |
==Definitions== | ==Definitions== | ||
| − | *: the [[act]] of ridiculing : derision, mockery | + | *: the [[act]] of ridiculing : derision, mockery |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | <center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Ridicule''''', follow [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Ridicule '''''this link'''''].</center> | ||
| + | |||
==Description== | ==Description== | ||
| − | [[Appeal]] to '''ridicule''', also called appeal to mockery, the Horse Laugh, or reductio ad ridiculum ([[Latin]]: "reduction to the ridiculous"), is a [ | + | [[Appeal]] to '''ridicule''', also called appeal to mockery, the Horse Laugh, or reductio ad ridiculum ([[Latin]]: "reduction to the ridiculous"), is a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_fallacy logical fallacy] which presents the [[opponent]]'s [[argument]] in a way that appears ridiculous, often to the extent of creating a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man straw man] of the [[actual]] [[argument]], rather than addressing the [[argument]] itself. For example: |
*"If [[Einstein]]'s theory of [[relativity]] is right, that would mean that when I drive my car it gets shorter and more massive the faster I go. That's crazy!" (This is, in [[fact]], true, but the [[effect]] is so minuscule that a human [[observer]] will not notice the effect at speeds far less than the [[speed of light]].) | *"If [[Einstein]]'s theory of [[relativity]] is right, that would mean that when I drive my car it gets shorter and more massive the faster I go. That's crazy!" (This is, in [[fact]], true, but the [[effect]] is so minuscule that a human [[observer]] will not notice the effect at speeds far less than the [[speed of light]].) | ||
*"[[Evolution]] is ridiculous! If evolution were true, that would mean that all the apes wouldn't be here any more, since they all would have evolved into [[humans]]!" (This is not implied by the theory of evolution, thus the [[argument]] is false.) | *"[[Evolution]] is ridiculous! If evolution were true, that would mean that all the apes wouldn't be here any more, since they all would have evolved into [[humans]]!" (This is not implied by the theory of evolution, thus the [[argument]] is false.) | ||
| − | This is a [[rhetorical]] tactic which mocks an [[opponent]]'s [[argument]], attempting to [[inspire]] an [[emotion]]al [[reaction]] (making it a type of [[appeal]] to [[emotion]]) in the [[audience]] and to highlight the counter-intuitive aspects of that argument, making it appear [[foolish]] and contrary to common sense. This is typically done by [[demonstrating]] the [[argument]]'s [[logic]] in an [[extreme]]ly [[absurd]] way or by presenting the argument in an overly [[simplified]] way, and often involves an [ | + | This is a [[rhetorical]] tactic which mocks an [[opponent]]'s [[argument]], attempting to [[inspire]] an [[emotion]]al [[reaction]] (making it a type of [[appeal]] to [[emotion]]) in the [[audience]] and to highlight the counter-intuitive aspects of that argument, making it appear [[foolish]] and contrary to common sense. This is typically done by [[demonstrating]] the [[argument]]'s [[logic]] in an [[extreme]]ly [[absurd]] way or by presenting the argument in an overly [[simplified]] way, and often involves an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_consequences appeal to consequences]. |
Appeal to Ridicule is often found in the form of challenging one's credentials or maturity; | Appeal to Ridicule is often found in the form of challenging one's credentials or maturity; | ||
| Line 20: | Line 26: | ||
The [[argument]] is ridiculed on the basis that having a view commonly associated with [[youth]] is somehow invalid. | The [[argument]] is ridiculed on the basis that having a view commonly associated with [[youth]] is somehow invalid. | ||
| − | Although they appear very similar, this [[fallacy]] should not be confused with [ | + | Although they appear very similar, this [[fallacy]] should not be confused with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum reductio ad absurdum], which is a valid [[type]] of logical [[argument]]. |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| − | *[ | + | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignoratio_elenchi#Red_herring Red Herring] |
| − | *[ | + | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man Straw man] |
==References== | ==References== | ||
| − | [ | + | [https://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-ridicule.html Nizkor Project - Appeal to Ridicule] |
[[Category: Languages and Literature]] | [[Category: Languages and Literature]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:35, 13 December 2020
Origin
French or Latin; French, from Latin ridiculum jest
Definitions
- the act of ridiculing : derision, mockery
Description
Appeal to ridicule, also called appeal to mockery, the Horse Laugh, or reductio ad ridiculum (Latin: "reduction to the ridiculous"), is a logical fallacy which presents the opponent's argument in a way that appears ridiculous, often to the extent of creating a straw man of the actual argument, rather than addressing the argument itself. For example:
- "If Einstein's theory of relativity is right, that would mean that when I drive my car it gets shorter and more massive the faster I go. That's crazy!" (This is, in fact, true, but the effect is so minuscule that a human observer will not notice the effect at speeds far less than the speed of light.)
- "Evolution is ridiculous! If evolution were true, that would mean that all the apes wouldn't be here any more, since they all would have evolved into humans!" (This is not implied by the theory of evolution, thus the argument is false.)
This is a rhetorical tactic which mocks an opponent's argument, attempting to inspire an emotional reaction (making it a type of appeal to emotion) in the audience and to highlight the counter-intuitive aspects of that argument, making it appear foolish and contrary to common sense. This is typically done by demonstrating the argument's logic in an extremely absurd way or by presenting the argument in an overly simplified way, and often involves an appeal to consequences.
Appeal to Ridicule is often found in the form of challenging one's credentials or maturity;
The argument is ridiculed on the basis that having a view commonly associated with youth is somehow invalid.
Although they appear very similar, this fallacy should not be confused with reductio ad absurdum, which is a valid type of logical argument.
