Changes

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
13,420 bytes added ,  18:17, 8 November 2009
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
[[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Diderot.jpg|right|frame]]
+
[[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Global-responsibility.jpg|right|frame]]
   −
The Age of '''Enlightenment''', or simply The Enlightenment, is a term used to describe a time in Western [[philosophy]] and cultural life, centered upon the eighteenth century, in which [[reason]] was advocated as the primary source and legitimacy for [[authority]].[1]
+
==Definition==
 +
'''Responsibility''' is the [[state]] of [[being]] Responsible (see below)
 +
===Adjective===
 +
*1. Correspondent or answering to something. Obs.
   −
Developing more or less simultaneously in Germany, France, Great Britain, The Netherlands, Italy, Spain, and Portugal, and buoyed by the North American colonists' successful rebellion against Great Britain in the American War of Independence, the culmination of the movement spread through much of Europe, including the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Russia and Scandinavia, along with Latin America and instigating the Haitian Revolution. It has been argued that the signatories of the American Declaration of Independence, the United States Bill of Rights, the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, and the Polish-Lithuanian Constitution of May 3, 1791, were motivated by "Enlightenment" principles.
+
:1599 B. JONSON Ev. Man out of Hum. II. i, The admiration of your Forme; to which (if the bounties of your minde be any way responsible) [etc.].  
===Definitions==
+
:1629 MAXWELL tr. Herodian (1635) 140 If you expect a Doome, or Death, responsible to your blacke deeds, and detestable Villanies; the World cannot afford it.  
*1. The [[action]] of enlightening; the [[state]] of [[being]] [[enlighten]]ed. Only in fig. sense The imparting or receiving [[mental]] or [[spiritual]] light.
+
:1698 FRYER Acc. E. India & P. 14 The Mouth large, but not responsible to so large a Body.
*2. Sometimes used [after Ger. Aufklärung, Aufklärerei] to designate the spirit and aims of the French [[philosopher]]s of the 18th c., or of others whom it is intended to associate with them in the implied charge of shallow and pretentious i[[Intellectual|ntellectualism]], unreasonable contempt for [[tradition]] and authority, etc.
  −
==Use of the term==
  −
The term "Enlightenment" came into use in [[English]] during the mid-nineteenth century,[2] with particular reference to French [[philosophy]], as the equivalent of a term then in use by German writers, Zeitalter der Aufklärung (Age of the clarification), signifying generally the philosophical outlook of the eighteenth century. However, the German term Aufklärung was not merely applied retrospectively; it was already the common term by 1784, when [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant Immanuel Kant] published the influential essay "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_is_Enlightenment%3F Answering the Question: What is Enlightenment?]"
     −
The terminology Enlightenment or Age of Enlightenment does not represent a single [[movement]] or school of [[thought]], for these philosophies were often mutually contradictory or divergent. The Enlightenment was less a set of [[ideas]] than it was a set of [[values]]. At its core was a [[critical]] [inquiry|questioning]] of [[traditional]] institutions, customs, and morals. Thus, there was still a considerable degree of similarities between competing philosophies. Also, some philosophical schools of the period could not be considered part of the Enlightenment at all. Some classifications of this period also include the late seventeenth century, which is typically known as the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Reason Age of Reason] or Age of Rationalism.[3]
+
*2. Capable of [[being]] answered. Obs. rare1.
   −
==Timespan==
+
:1647 LILLY Chr. Astrol. lviii. 383 This is a difficult Question, and yet by Astrologie responsible.
There is no [[consensus]] on when to date the start of the age of Enlightenment, and some [[scholars]] simply use the beginning of the eighteenth century or the middle of the seventeenth century as a default date.[4] If taken back to the mid-1600s, the Enlightenment would trace its origins to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/René_Descartes Descartes]' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discourse_on_the_Method Discourse on the Method], published in 1637. Others define the Enlightenment as beginning in Britain's Glorious Revolution of 1688 or with the publication of Isaac Newton's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophiæ_Naturalis_Principia_Mathematica Principia Mathematica]. As to its end, some scholars use the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Revolution French Revolution] of 1789 or the beginning of the Napoleonic Wars (1804–15) as a convenient point in time with which to date the end of the Enlightenment.[5]
  −
==Influence==
  −
Historian [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Gay Peter Gay] asserts the Enlightenment broke through "the [[sacred]] [[circle]],"[6] whose [[dogma]] had circumscribed [[thinking]]. The Enlightenment is held to be the source of critical ideas, such as the centrality of [[freedom]], [[democracy]], and [[reason]] as primary [[value]]s of [[society]]. This view argues that the establishment of a contractual basis of rights would lead to the market [[mechanism]] and [[capitalism]], the [[scientific method]], religious [[tolerance]], and the organization of [[state]]s into self-governing republics through democratic means. In this view, the tendency of the philosophes in particular to apply [[rationality]] to every problem is considered the [[essential]] [[change]].
  −
No brief summary can do [[justice]] to the [[diversity]] of enlightened thought in 18th-century Europe. Because it was a [[value]] [[system]] rather than a set of shared [[belief]]s, there are many contradictory trains to follow. In his famous essay "What is Enlightenment?" (1784), Immanuel Kant described it simply as freedom to use one's own [[intelligence]].[7] More broadly, the Enlightenment period is marked by increasing empiricism, scientific rigor, and reductionism, along with increasing questioning of religious orthodoxy.
  −
A variety of 19th-century movements, including liberalism and neo-classicism, traced their intellectual heritage back to the Enlightenment.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment]
  −
==References==
  −
# John Locke claims in his book, The Second Treatise of Government, that man was endowed with reason and hence has the right to decide the form of government that he should be under, while Jean Jacques Rousseau claims that reason is what has led man astray from the state of happiness and bliss that he led under nature.
  −
# Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd Edn (revised)
  −
# Hackett, Louis (1992). "The age of Enlightenment". Retrieved 2008-01-18.
  −
# Hooker, Richard (1996). "The European Enlightenment". Retrieved 2008-01-18.
  −
# Frost, Martin (2008). "The age of Enlightenment". Retrieved 2008-01-18.
  −
# Gay, Peter (1996). The Enlightenment: An Interpretation. W. W. Norton & Company.
  −
# Blissett, Luther (1997). "Anarchist Integralism: Aesthetics, Politics and the Après-Garde". Retrieved 2008-01-18.
     −
[[Category: History]]
+
*3. a. Answerable, accountable (to another for something); liable to be called to account.
[[Category: Science]]
+
 
 +
----
 +
 
 +
<center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''Responsibility''', follow [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Responsibility this link].</center>
 +
 
 +
----
 +
 
 +
:1643 PRYNNE Sov. Power Parl. III. App. 12 To hold this Popish erronious opinion, that they are in no case responsible to their whole Kingdomes or Parliaments for their grossest exorbitances.
 +
:1662 J. DAVIES tr. Olearius' Voy. Ambass. 405 Being responsible to the King for what might happen to us.
 +
:1720 WATERLAND Doctr. Trin. v. Wks.
 +
:1823 V. 115 Willing or not willing, every man is responsible, at last, for the doctrines he teaches. 1790 BURKE Fr. Rev. 42 Our constitution has made no sort of provision towards rendering him, as a servant, in any degree responsible.
 +
:1850 MCCOSH Div. Govt. III. i. (1874) 278 Man is a free agent and morally responsible to his Governor. 1868 FREEMAN Norm. Conq. (1877) II. 321 The country was left..without any single responsible chief.
 +
:b. Morally accountable for one's [[action]]s; capable of [[rational]] conduct.
 +
:1836 J. GILBERT Chr. Atonem. ii. (1852) 50 The great God has treated us as responsible beings.
 +
:1858 FROUDE Hist. Eng. IV. xviii. 35 James arrived at an age when he could be treated as responsible.
 +
:1875 BAIN Mental & Mor. Sci. 396 In criminal procedure, a man is accounted responsible if motives still continue to have power over him.
 +
:c. responsible [[government]]: (see quot. 1910); also in extended use (esp. under influence of sense 5).
 +
:1839 LD. DURHAM Rep. Affairs Brit. N. Amer. 142 By creating high prizes in a general and responsible Government, we shall immediately afford the means of pacifying the turbulent ambitions, and of employing in worthy and noble occupations the talents which now are only exerted to foment disorder.
 +
:1865 EARL RUSSELL Essay on Hist. Eng. Govt. & Constitution p. lxviii, Others said, ‘the grant of what is called “responsible government” [in Canada] is a grant of independence. It must be resisted.’
 +
:1906 W. S. CHURCHILL in R. S. Churchill Winston S. Churchill (1969) II. Compan. I. 506 We are not, of course, confined to any particular form of Responsible Government.
 +
:1910 Colonial Office List V. i. 633 The colonies possessing responsible government, in which the Crown has only reserved the power of disallowing legislation and the Secretary of State for the Colonies has no control over any public officer except the Governor. ::1930 G. B. SHAW Apple Cart I. 33 The people have found out long ago that democracy is humbug, and that instead of establishing responsible government it has abolished it. :1957 Encycl. Brit. XII. 174/2 The device known as dyarchy, or double government,..was intended to train Indians for responsible government.
 +
 
 +
*4. U.S. Answerable to a charge.
 +
 
 +
:1650 in T. Hutchinson Hist. Mass. (1765) 452 You are required to attach the goods or lands of William Stevens to the value of one hundred pounds, so as to bind the same to be responsible at the next court at Boston.
 +
 
 +
*5. a. Capable of fulfilling an obligation or [[trust]]; reliable, trustworthy; of good credit and repute. Also in Comb.
 +
 
 +
:1691 LOCKE Consid. Money Wks.
 +
:1714 II. 12 Not knowing that the Bill or Bond is true or legal, or that the Man bound to me is honest or responsible.
 +
:1817 JANE AUSTEN Persuasion iii, Could not be a better time, Sir Walter, for having a choice of tenants, very responsible tenants.
 +
:1853 C. BRONTË Villette xiv, There was about him a manly responsible look, that redeemed his youth.
 +
:1884 J. QUINCY Figures of Past 345 The collection and delivery of parcels..might be undertaken by one responsible person. 1896 H. JOHNSTON Dr. Congalton's Legacy ix. 103 Responsible land-owners, bonnet-lairds, farmers, otherwise a nondescript crowd.
 +
 
 +
:Comb. 1852 DICKENS Bleak Ho. xxviii, A responsible-looking gentleman dressed in black.
 +
:1891 MOSTYN Curatica 57 When the meeting was dissolved, I joined myself to a responsible-looking brother, and..begged an explanation.
 +
:1960 Times 7 Mar. 13/5 Are publishers responsible-minded parents?
 +
 
 +
:b. Of respectable [[appearance]].
 +
 
 +
:1780 S. G. PRATT Emma Corbett (ed. 4) I. 98 A new wig..to be made so as to resemble a responsible head of hair.
 +
:1852 DICKENS Bleak Ho. lviii, His linen is arranged to a nicety, and he is wrapped in a responsible dressing-gown.
 +
 
 +
*6. Involving responsibility or obligation.
 +
 
 +
:1855 PRESCOTT Philip II, I. I. ii. 12 He selected two persons for the responsible office of superintending his education.
 +
:1880 19th Cent. Apr. 707 Native officers so appointed to high and responsible positions.
 +
 
 +
===Noun===
 +
*An [[actor]] who undertakes to play any part which may be temporarily required.
 +
 
 +
:1885 JEROME On the Stage 80 In the provinces, thirty shillings is a high figure for a good all-round ‘responsibles’. Ibid. 121 Hearing that one of their ‘responsibles’ had just left, I went straight to the manager,..and was accepted.
 +
 
 +
(Hence responsibleness)
 +
 
 +
:1727 in BAILEY (vol. II).
 +
:1812 G. CHALMERS Dom. Econ. Gt. Brit. 138 At this crisis..every bill was suspected, as being of doubtful responsibleness.
 +
:1856 EMERSON Eng. Traits v. Ability, They have solidarity, or responsibleness, and trust in each other.
 +
 
 +
==Description==
 +
===Moral Responsibility===
 +
Moral responsibility can refer to two different but related [[things]].
 +
*First, a person has moral responsibility for a situation if that person has an obligation to ensure that something happens. Assume that John promises to baby-sit for his neighbour while she goes to a job interview. However, he decides he will go to a concert instead. Arguably, John has moral responsibility for finding another appropriate babysitter for his neighbour.
 +
*Second, a person has moral responsibility for a situation when it would be correct to morally praise or blame that person for the situation. If John fails to find an appropriate babysitter, then he might be said to have moral responsibility for his neighbour's failure to make her job interview.
 +
 
 +
People who have moral responsibility for an [[action]] are usually called moral [[agents]]. Agents are [[creatures]] that are capable of reflecting on their situation, forming [[intention]]s about how they will act, and then carrying out that action.
 +
====Moral, causal and legal responsibility====
 +
Moral responsibility is both related to and different from causal responsibility and legal responsibility.[1] People are causally responsible for events when those events are directly brought about by their actions. Often when people have moral responsibility for a situation, they also have causal responsibility for that situation. Someone who is praised for acting in a morally responsible way has usually caused some good state of affairs to occur. To see that a person can have moral responsibility without causal responsibility, however, consider that john might claim that there was nothing in his failure to keep his promise that caused his neighbour to fail to make her job interview. (she could have taken her child with her, or found some other babysitter, for example.) Nevertheless, he may still be morally responsible for her failing to attend the interview. A person is legally responsible for his or her actions when it is that person who will be penalised in the court system for an event that has occurred. Although, it may often be the case that when a person is morally responsible for some act, they are also legally responsible for some act, there are clearly exceptions to this rule. Rules of [[law]] and rules of [[ethics]] do not always overlap.
 +
====Collective moral responsibility====
 +
When people attribute '''moral responsibility''', they usually attribute it to [[individual]] moral [[agents]]. However, Joel Feinberg, among others, has argued that corporations and other groups of people can have what is called ‘collective moral responsibility’ for a state of affairs.[2] For example, when South Africa had an apartheid regime, the country's government might have been said to have had collective moral responsibility for the violation of the rights of non-European South Africans.
 +
====Moral responsibility, free will and determinism====
 +
The [[existence]] of moral responsibility is an important factor in [[philosophical]] [[arguments]] about [[free will]] and [[determinism]].[3] These arguments sometimes begin by assuming that [[human being]]s have moral responsibility, and argue from that premise to the conclusion that humans have [[free will]]. At other times, philosophers who hold that every event is either determined or occurs due to chance have concluded that there is no such thing as moral responsibility.
 +
 
 +
====Footnotes====
 +
# Klein, Martha. 1995. ‘Responsibility’, In Ted Honderich, (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 +
# Risser, David T. 2006. 'Collective Moral Responsibility'. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Accessed 8 Sept 2007)
 +
# Waller, Bruce N. 2005. 'Conditions for Moral Responsibility'. In Consider Ethics: Theory, Readings and Contemporary Issues. New York: Pearson Longman: 215-216, 219-221.
 +
====References====
 +
8Meyer, Susan Sauvé, Chappell, T.D.J. 'Aristotle on Moral Responsibility' . Book review, Mind, New Series, Vol. 105, No. 417 (Jan., 1996), pp. 181-186, Oxford University Press. [1]
 +
*Klein, Martha. 1995. ‘Responsibility’, In Ted Honderich, (ed.), ‘’The Oxford Companion to Philosophy’’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 +
*Risser, David T. 2006. 'Collective Moral Responsibility'. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Accessed 8 Sept 2007)
 +
*Rosebury, Brian, Moral Responsibility and "Moral Luck", The Philosophical Review, Vol. 104, No. 4 (Oct., 1995), pp. 499-524
 +
*Waller, Bruce N. 2005. 'Freedom, Moral Responsibility, and Ethics'. In Consider Ethics: Theory, Readings and Contemporary Issues. New York: Pearson Longman: 215-233.
 +
====External links====
 +
* [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~uctytho/ted12.htm Free Will, Determinism, and Moral Responsibility - The Whole Thing in Brief] by [[Ted Honderich]]
 +
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/ "Moral responsibility"], [[Andrew Eshleman]], [[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]] (Fall 2004 Edition)
 +
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/computing-responsibility/ "Computing and Moral Responsibility"], Kari Gwen Coleman, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2005 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
 +
===Responsibility Assumption===
 +
Responsibility Assumption is a doctrine in the [[personal]] growth field holding that each [[individual]] has substantial or total '''responsibility''' for the events and circumstances that befall them in their life. While there is little that is notable about the notion that each person has at least some role in shaping their [[experience]], the doctrine of responsibility assumption posits that the [[individual]]'s mental contribution to his or her own experience is substantially greater than is normally thought. "I must have wanted this" is the type of catchphrase used by adherents of this doctrine when encountering situations, pleasant or unpleasant, to remind them that their own desires and choices led to the present outcome.
 +
 
 +
The term responsibility assumption thus has a specialized [[meaning]] beyond the general concept of taking responsibility for something, and is not to be confused with the general notion of making an assumption that a [[concept]] such as "responsibility" exists.
 +
====Variations in degree of personal responsibility postulated====
 +
The main variable in the different interpretations of the responsibility assumption doctrine is the degree to which the [[individual]] is considered the cause of his or her own [[experience]], ranging from partial but substantial, to total.
 +
=====Partial but substantial responsibility=====
 +
In its forms positing less than total responsibility, the doctrine appears in nearly all motivational programs, some [[psychotherapy]], and large [[group]] awareness training programs. In programs as non-controversial as [[books]] on the [[power]] of positive [[thinking]], it functions as a [[mechanism]] to point out that each individual does affect the perceived world by the decisions they make each day and by the choices they made in the past. These less absolute forms may be expressed within the rubric that we cannot control the situations that befall us, but we can at least control our [[attitude]]s toward them.
 +
=====Total responsibility=====
 +
In its more [[absolute]] form, the doctrine becomes both more pronounced and more controversial. Perhaps the most prominent dividing line of controversy is the threshold of reversed mental causation, where sufficient responsibility is assigned to the [[individual]] that their [[thoughts]] or mental [[attitude]]s are considered the actual cause of external situations or physical occurrences rather than vice-versa, along the lines of the catchphrase, "[[mind]] over [[matter]]." In this realm the doctrine can present controversial propositions such as, "you chose to have cancer and can just as easily become well if you choose," or the even more shocking and unpalatable proposition, "this genocide took place because the victims wanted to die." Despite the extremity of these positions, there are indeed groups and schools of thought subscribing to the doctrine of responsibility assumption that would support these propositions and more.[1]
 +
====Religious and philosophical roots and usage====
 +
The est seminars popularized the doctrine "responsibility assumption" in the 1970s although they did not explicitly use the term. The doctrine both predates est and is found in a far wider variety of settings. The doctrine has [[spiritual]] roots in the [[monism]] of Eastern religious traditions which hold that only one true [[being]] exists, and all people are one with each other and with god and hence possess Godlike [[power]]s, though they are often unaware of it. It has been likened to [[karma]], which however tends to suggest later retribution for earlier acts, while responsibility assumption posits more of an immediate link between the [[experience]] desired and the outcome received. The doctrine also has associations with the neoplatonist notion of an [[illusory]] world, which the doctrine's adherents would phrase more precisely as an [[illusion]] of external worldly effects on inner mental states. It finds further support in philosophical idealism, which posits [[thought]] as the one true substance.
 +
 
 +
Among historically Christian churches, denominations have [[belief]] systems that incorporate doctrinal elements similar to responsibility assumption. The doctrine can be found in the work of psychotherapist Georg Groddeck assigning mental causes to physical ailments, has been more recently propagated by self-help authors such as Arnold Patent, and can be found in a number of [[New Age]] and [[new religious movements]]. Prominent among these are [[Christian Science]] and the [[New Thought Movement]], whose constituent theologies espouse mental approaches to bodily healing and express precepts such as, "to each, according to his belief." The doctrine combined with reversed causation can further be found explicitly expressed in works such as [[A Course in Miracles]].
 +
====In popular culture====
 +
The theme of responsibility assumption appears in several places in popular culture. For example, it appeared in Richard Bach's bestseller, ''Jonathan Livingston Seagull'', and Bach addressed the topic more directly in a less-popular later book, ''Illusions''.
 +
[[John Denver]], a proponent of est, wrote two songs about it, ''Farewell Andromeda'' (1973) and ''Looking for Space'' (1975), and the opening lines of ''Farewell Andromeda'' capture the essence of responsibility assumption:
 +
<blockquote>Welcome to my morning, welcome to my day
 +
I'm the one responsible, I made it just this way
 +
To make myself some pictures, see what they might bring
 +
I think I made it perfectly, I wouldn't change a thing</blockquote>
 +
 
 +
The 1956 movie ''Forbidden Planet'' featured an analogous [[concept]] to responsibility assumption, about a [[race]] who, through technology, became able to materialize their thoughts, to disastrous ends.
 +
 
 +
The 1967 television series ''The Prisoner'' featured an ambiguous climax spawning several interpretations, one of which implicates responsibility assumption. Throughout the short seventeen-episode series, the eponymous prisoner, a man held against his will by a mysterious [[group]], attempted to determine—and in the final episode apparently succeeded in determining—the [[identity]] of the mysterious [[person]] who led the [[group]] and thus ultimately determined the prisoner's fate. The [[moment]] of [[revelation]] in which the mysterious leader was literally unmasked by the prisoner was brief and unclear, but there are fans of the series who believe the unmasked leader was the prisoner himself.
 +
 
 +
Though these are prominent examples, varying degrees of the doctrine of responsibility assumption have formed a minor theme more broadly within the United States cultural landscape since the 1960s [[counterculture]].
 +
 
 +
Generally, different cultures place different weight on [[individual]] responsibility and that this [[difference]] is manifested in [[folklore]]. In this view, the tale of the ''Fisherman'' and the ''Little Goldfish'' (in which the protagonist makes little effort to improve his lot) illustrates the denial of responsibility. In the late 20th century US, the best-selling didactic and allegorical fable ''Who Moved My Cheese?'' underscored personal responsibility for one's livelihood and thus well-being.
 +
====References====
 +
# Espouse total responsibility
 +
:[http://www.mrfire.com/article-archives/new-articles/worlds-most-unusual-therapist.html Dr. Joe Vitale]
 +
:[http://www.landmarkeducation.com/display_content.jsp?top=21&mid=80&bottom=124&siteObjectID=368 Landmark Education at this site states]:
 +
::“Responsibility,” according to The Charter of The Landmark Education Corporation, “begins with the willingness to be cause in the matter of one’s life. Ultimately, it is a context from which one chooses to live.” To be cause in the matter of one’s life is only possible if there are no other causes to which one is ultimately subject.
 +
====Nonfiction====
 +
Anonymous (1992). [[A Course in Miracles]] (2d ed.). Mill Valley, CA: Foundation for Inner Peace. ISBN 0-9606388-8-1.
 +
May, Rollo, and Irvin D. Yalom (1984). "Existential Psychotherapy," pp. 354-391 in Raymond J. Corsini, ed., Current Psychotherapies (3rd ed.). Itasca, IL: Peacock.
 +
====Fiction====
 +
Bach, Richard. ''Illusions—Confessions of a Reluctant Messiah.''
 +
Bach, Richard (1970). ''Jonathan Livingston Seagull''.
 +
[edit]External link
 +
[http://www.christopheravery.com/blog Leadership Personal Responsibility]
 +
 
 +
[[Category: Philosophy]]
 +
[[Category: Law]]
 +
[[Category: Religion]]
 +
[[Category: Psychology]]

Navigation menu