Changes

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search

Talk:2001-05-12-The Part To The Whole (view source)

Revision as of 13:11, 20 June 2013

3,913 bytes added ,  13:11, 20 June 2013
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
[[File:lighterstill.jpg]]
 
[[File:lighterstill.jpg]]
    +
==June 19==
 
'''Rob wrote to tml: Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:39 PM'''
 
'''Rob wrote to tml: Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:39 PM'''
   Line 69: Line 70:     
A link was supplied in my original email, but I [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2001-05-12-The_Part_To_The_Whole#Lesson enclose it here for you].
 
A link was supplied in my original email, but I [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2001-05-12-The_Part_To_The_Whole#Lesson enclose it here for you].
 +
 +
'''Gerdean wrote:Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:38 PM'''
 +
 +
I too thought it might be "countenance" since it followed the reference to "uphold your face" and "the great pretense" -- both of which make countenance seem plausible.  But continuance would fit, too, although it seems almost to too simple.  I would ask Henry Z., since he is the T/R and he is still alive and well.
 +
 +
'''Craig Bergland wrote: Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:02 PM'''
 +
 +
Let me suggest a 're-look' as I find this after having read the link...
 +
 +
Paragraph 2 of lesson...
 +
In doing so, Michael's universe of personality and spiritual countenance created life on thousands of worlds which would take up in time, the honored spiritual heritage reserved for the creature whose will was capable of surrendering its nature to embrace willfully a mightier and more translucent nature, the nature of the Divine and the Supreme.
 +
 +
Perhaps used as 2nd or 3rd meaning of the word.  Used as unlike Michaels's meaning.  Just had to point this out as a participant. Or is this all moot?
 +
Thx.
 +
 +
'''Rob wrote:Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:17 PM'''
 +
 +
Is Henry on tml? If so, his comment being the TR would override others.
 +
 +
'''Rob wrote:  Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:19 PM'''
 +
 +
Thank you Craig! Let's see if Henry can clarify.
 +
 +
'''Steffani wrote: Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:01 PM'''
 +
 +
Yes, he recently rejoined...
 +
 +
'''Gerdean wrote: Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:03 PM'''
 +
 +
As new Light Line facilitator, I think he is on TML, however, he has not been active for many moons, so I doubt he is paying any attention.  You might want to send him a personal email, Rob, and ask him specifically.  Just because someone is not on TML does not mean they are not still an active operant in the mission itself.
 +
 +
'''Henry Z. wrote:Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:19 PM'''
 +
 +
what is it you want clarification on? henry
 +
 +
'''Rob wrote:Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:46 PM'''
 +
 +
Henry-
 +
 +
Here is the first post on this thread where I asked for input on what is obviously a wrong (relative to intent) word. Let me know what you think.
 +
 +
Thanks,
 +
 +
Rob
 +
 +
Enclosed: first post
 +
 +
'''Henry Z. wrote: Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:48 PM'''
 +
 +
There is a misspelling here the word should be countenance, and then again you could substitute and use integrity which would work. I guess JarEl was meaning something close to human truth, in a sense countenance could mean human truth; composure, bearing and self control could mean truth. Also integrity as soundness, completeness, and unity, could also refer to human truth. I don't always get the word right; sometimes in our language we don't have words for the concepts the teacher's are trying to convey, at least this is my personal experience. I mean I can be shown a huge concept in a single glimpse. I am thinking that the language the teachers are familiar with might have a single word to express such concepts, which in our language have no words because we haven't been using these concepts, they are morontial.
 +
 +
'''Henry Z. wrote: Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:54 PM'''
 +
 +
i guess the sentence would have to read, characterizes your age of materialism with it's disregard for human integrity and planetary life.
 +
henry
 +
 +
==June 20==
 +
'''W. Williams wrote:Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:08 AM'''
 +
 +
Maybe continence was the correct word... It has to do with the ability to get rid of bodiy fluid... (not serious)
 +
 +
...thinking about getting to the Mansion Worlds and telling our Superiors there that Monjoronson told us not to be concerned with the Illuminatti Banksters. This is just a "Curiosity Subject"...
 +
 +
'''Rob wrote:Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:10 PM'''
 +
 +
Thank you Henry for sharing your own thoughts recognizing the inherent ambiguity of any process involving material symbols. If you don't object, I will let the record stand with ''countenance''. However, your follow up thoughts along with all other comments have been place in the discussion page for future reference and ongoing consideration.
Retrieved from "http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/107349"

Navigation menu