102,800
edits
Changes
From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to searchTalk:2014-04-23-New Era Conversations 19 (view source)
Revision as of 11:57, 27 April 2014
, 11:57, 27 April 2014→April 27, 2014: new section
This Daniel Raphael forum attributed to our [[Magisterial Son]] indulges in a display of ignorance that is reminiscent of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_limbaugh Rush Limbaugh] show. This makes it necessary for me as the one who is hosting these records for public examination to offer alternative opinions in the record's discussion page as the only way to show that all of these human documents do not enjoy the affirmation of those who read them. Instead they may be merely evidence of something greater, irreducible to the methods of indirection inherent in second hand approaches to divinity so often appropriated by mortals for material gain.
This Daniel Raphael forum attributed to our [[Magisterial Son]] indulges in a display of ignorance that is reminiscent of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_limbaugh Rush Limbaugh] show. This makes it necessary for me as the one who is hosting these records for public examination to offer alternative opinions in the record's discussion page as the only way to show that all of these human documents do not enjoy the affirmation of those who read them. Instead they may be merely evidence of something greater, irreducible to the methods of indirection inherent in second hand approaches to divinity so often appropriated by mortals for material gain.
Gratefully,
Rob
== April 27, 2014 ==
'''Rob wrote:On Apr 27, 2014, at 10:54 amCT'''
Hello Rick-
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! To be sure, I am a devotee of faithfully hosting literature attributed to our unseen friends regardless of reservations concerning their value. It is a very human story we are weaving as we speak, and I appreciate its beauty unifying the many contrasts available for us to experience in the mortal frame.
Matters of fact occur in an arena where skepticism is helpful inasmuch as it requires all information to be well supported by evidence. In this regard, I welcome what you refer to as the "down and dirty" manner of Daniel's representation of Charles. Of course, I don't think for minute that a being of his order will be concerned with the dirt on the face of any who find themselves in error of fact. It is, after all, not mere information that is transformative, rather such details of fact meaningfully integrated in a mind infused with the value our being that is limitless.
As for what I see that "appeals to money, mass audiences, and strong arm politics" in this transcript, it is the attempt to function as trusted political commentator who could be relied upon to give the true perspective into situations on the ground much the way propaganda machines wielded by states conducting what is euphemistically called public diplomacy as a tool to embolden their delusions of national supremacy. However, this is only the latest in a number of transmissions attributed to Daniel that are indicative of a human overreaching his limited capacity to represent a knowledge that is not his own. As a result, his work is impugned by the discovery of error "on the ground".
Your comments are not flippant but an essential component of making more credible this experience of walking and working hand in hand with those who are, by their nature, unseen to material senses.
Gratefully,
Gratefully,
Rob
Rob
