Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| ==Origin== | | ==Origin== |
| Medieval Latin mediatus, past participle of mediare, from Late Latin, to be in the middle, from [[Latin]] medius middle | | Medieval Latin mediatus, past participle of mediare, from Late Latin, to be in the middle, from [[Latin]] medius middle |
− | *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_century 16th Century] | + | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_century 16th Century] |
| ==Definitions== | | ==Definitions== |
| :transitive verb | | :transitive verb |
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
| *History of mediation | | *History of mediation |
| | | |
− | The activity of '''mediation''' in itself appeared in very ancient times. Historians presume early cases in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenicia Phoenician] [[commerce]] (but suppose its use in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylon Babylon], too). The [[practice]] developed in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Greece Ancient Greece] (which knew the non-marital mediator as a proxenetas), then in [[Roman]] [[civilization]], (Roman law, starting from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justinian_I Justinian's] Digest of 530 - 533 CE) recognized mediation. The Romans called mediators by a variety of [[names]], including internuncius, [[medium]], intercessor, philantropus, interpolator, conciliator, interlocutor, interpres, and finally mediator. | + | The activity of '''mediation''' in itself appeared in very ancient times. Historians presume early cases in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenicia Phoenician] [[commerce]] (but suppose its use in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylon Babylon], too). The [[practice]] developed in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Greece Ancient Greece] (which knew the non-marital mediator as a proxenetas), then in [[Roman]] [[civilization]], (Roman law, starting from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justinian_I Justinian's] Digest of 530 - 533 CE) recognized mediation. The Romans called mediators by a variety of [[names]], including internuncius, [[medium]], intercessor, philantropus, interpolator, conciliator, interlocutor, interpres, and finally mediator. |
| | | |
− | Some [[cultures]] regarded the mediator as a [[sacred]] figure, [[worthy]] of particular [[respect]]; and the role partly overlapped with that of [[traditional]] [[wise]] men or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribal_chief tribal chief]. | + | Some [[cultures]] regarded the mediator as a [[sacred]] figure, [[worthy]] of particular [[respect]]; and the role partly overlapped with that of [[traditional]] [[wise]] men or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribal_chief tribal chief]. |
| | | |
| *Mediation and conciliation | | *Mediation and conciliation |
Line 24: |
Line 24: |
| "Conciliation" sometimes serves as an umbrella-term that covers all mediation and [[facilitative]] and advisory dispute-resolution processes. Neither [[process]] determines an outcome, and both [[share]] many similarities. For example, both processes involve a neutral third-party who has no enforcing [[powers]]. | | "Conciliation" sometimes serves as an umbrella-term that covers all mediation and [[facilitative]] and advisory dispute-resolution processes. Neither [[process]] determines an outcome, and both [[share]] many similarities. For example, both processes involve a neutral third-party who has no enforcing [[powers]]. |
| | | |
− | One significant [[difference]] between conciliation and mediation lies in the fact that conciliators possess expert [[knowledge]] of the [[domain]] in which they conciliate. The conciliator can make suggestions for settlement terms and can give advice on the subject-matter. Conciliators may also use their role to actively [[encourage]] the parties to come to a resolution. In certain [[types]] of dispute the conciliator has a [[duty]] to provide legal [[information]]. This helps any [[agreement]] reached to comply with any relevant [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory statutory] framework pertaining to the dispute. Therefore conciliation may include an advisory aspect. | + | One significant [[difference]] between conciliation and mediation lies in the fact that conciliators possess expert [[knowledge]] of the [[domain]] in which they conciliate. The conciliator can make suggestions for settlement terms and can give advice on the subject-matter. Conciliators may also use their role to actively [[encourage]] the parties to come to a resolution. In certain [[types]] of dispute the conciliator has a [[duty]] to provide legal [[information]]. This helps any [[agreement]] reached to comply with any relevant [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory statutory] framework pertaining to the dispute. Therefore conciliation may include an advisory aspect. |
| | | |
| Mediation works [[purely]] facilitatively: the practitioner has no advisory role. Instead, a mediator seeks to help parties to [[develop]] a [[shared]] [[understanding]] of the [[conflict]] and to [[work]] toward building a [[practical]] and lasting resolution. | | Mediation works [[purely]] facilitatively: the practitioner has no advisory role. Instead, a mediator seeks to help parties to [[develop]] a [[shared]] [[understanding]] of the [[conflict]] and to [[work]] toward building a [[practical]] and lasting resolution. |
Line 32: |
Line 32: |
| Furthermore, the definitions of mediation used by the [[different]] styles of mediation differ in that evaluative mediation has the main drive and goal of settlement, while transformative mediation, in [[contrast]], looks at conflict as a [[crisis]] in [[communication]] and seeks to help resolve the [[conflict]], thereby allowing people to feel empowered in themselves and better about each other. The agreement that arises from this type of mediation occurs as a natural outcome of the [[resolution]] of [[conflict]]. | | Furthermore, the definitions of mediation used by the [[different]] styles of mediation differ in that evaluative mediation has the main drive and goal of settlement, while transformative mediation, in [[contrast]], looks at conflict as a [[crisis]] in [[communication]] and seeks to help resolve the [[conflict]], thereby allowing people to feel empowered in themselves and better about each other. The agreement that arises from this type of mediation occurs as a natural outcome of the [[resolution]] of [[conflict]]. |
| | | |
− | Both mediation and conciliation serve to identify the disputed issues and to generate [[options]] that help disputants reach a mutually-satisfactory resolution. They both offer [[relatively]] flexible [[processes]]; and any settlement reached should have the [[agreement]] of all parties. This [[contrasts]] with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation litigation], which normally settles the dispute in favour of the party with the strongest legal [[argument]]. In-between the two operates [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_law collaborative law], which uses a facilitative [[process]] where each party has [[counsel]]. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediation] | + | Both mediation and conciliation serve to identify the disputed issues and to generate [[options]] that help disputants reach a mutually-satisfactory resolution. They both offer [[relatively]] flexible [[processes]]; and any settlement reached should have the [[agreement]] of all parties. This [[contrasts]] with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation litigation], which normally settles the dispute in favour of the party with the strongest legal [[argument]]. In-between the two operates [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_law collaborative law], which uses a facilitative [[process]] where each party has [[counsel]]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediation] |
| | | |
| [[Category: Law]] | | [[Category: Law]] |