Changes

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search

Talk:2012-05-16-Thought Adjuster Declaration (view source)

Revision as of 15:36, 20 May 2012

1,310 bytes removed ,  15:36, 20 May 2012
→‎May 19
Line 213: Line 213:  
Not wanting to argue for the sake of argument, but in search of truth ... beauty and goodness.  None of which seem to be in abundance here lately.   
 
Not wanting to argue for the sake of argument, but in search of truth ... beauty and goodness.  None of which seem to be in abundance here lately.   
   −
  −
----
  −
  −
Gerdean wrote: Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:43 PM
  −
  −
This is not about me.  You can have a conversation without my approval.  I was not interjecting anything into the conversation you two were having, Steffani and Ron.  I was responding to Ron's post, exclusively.  My "Thank you, Steffani" was in support of your commentary, which was the first thing I read that morning, and which seemed to support my contentions, but it was not intended that my remarks "derail" any conversation between you and Ron or anybody else.  All of us have experienced comments from the peanut gallery. Life goes on.  And hopefully, so do discussions.  I am still interested in the subject; if I were not interested, would I have even taken exception to what Ron had to say?
  −
  −
For example, the transcript Ron sent was introduced as from "a Thought Adjuster" -- it did not necessarily say it was HIS Thought Adjuster (as I believe Rob Davis construed and set forth in the Nordan Symposium).  If it is not Ron Besser, then who is it?  Why has the trend (especially since Monjoronson has taken the reigns) become one of "the lone T/R" -- and requently the lone, unidentified T/R?
  −
  −
Not wanting to argue for the sake of argument, but in search of truth ... beauty and goodness.  None of which seem to be in abundance here lately.
  −
      
----
 
----
Retrieved from "http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/96332"

Navigation menu