Difference between revisions of "Exigency"

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with 'File:lighterstill.jpgright|frame ==Origin== French exigence, < Latin exigentia, < exigent-em, present participle of exigĕre (Urgent) *[http://en.w...')
 
m (Text replacement - "http://" to "https://")
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Origin==
 
==Origin==
 
French exigence, < [[Latin]] exigentia, < exigent-em, present participle of exigĕre (Urgent)
 
French exigence, < [[Latin]] exigentia, < exigent-em, present participle of exigĕre (Urgent)
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_century 1581]
+
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_century 1581]
 
==Definitions==
 
==Definitions==
 
*1: that which is required in a particular [[situation]] —usually used in plural <exceptionally quick in [[responding]] to the exigencies of [[modern]] [[warfare]] — D. B. Ottaway>
 
*1: that which is required in a particular [[situation]] —usually used in plural <exceptionally quick in [[responding]] to the exigencies of [[modern]] [[warfare]] — D. B. Ottaway>
Line 9: Line 9:
 
:b : a state of affairs that makes urgent demands <a [[leader]] must [[act]] in any sudden exigency>  
 
:b : a state of affairs that makes urgent demands <a [[leader]] must [[act]] in any sudden exigency>  
 
==Description==
 
==Description==
An '''exigent''' circumstance, in the [[American]] [[law]] of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_procedure criminal procedure], allows law enforcement to enter a [[structure]] without a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_(law) warrant], or if they have a "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knock_and_announce knock and announce]" warrant, without knocking and waiting for refusal under certain circumstances. It must be a situation where people are in imminent [[danger]], [[evidence]] faces imminent destruction, or a suspect will [[escape]].
+
An '''exigent''' circumstance, in the [[American]] [[law]] of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_procedure criminal procedure], allows law enforcement to enter a [[structure]] without a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_(law) warrant], or if they have a "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knock_and_announce knock and announce]" warrant, without knocking and waiting for refusal under certain circumstances. It must be a situation where people are in imminent [[danger]], [[evidence]] faces imminent destruction, or a suspect will [[escape]].
  
 
In the [[criminal]] [[procedure]] [[context]], exigent circumstance means:
 
In the [[criminal]] [[procedure]] [[context]], exigent circumstance means:
Line 17: Line 17:
 
<blockquote>Those circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry (or other relevant prompt action) was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of a suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating legitimate law enforcement efforts.</blockquote>
 
<blockquote>Those circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry (or other relevant prompt action) was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of a suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating legitimate law enforcement efforts.</blockquote>
  
Exigent circumstances may make a warrantless search [[constitutional]] if [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probable_cause probable cause] exists. The [[existence]] of exigent circumstances is a mixed question of [[law]] and [[fact]]. There is no [[absolute]] test for determining if exigent circumstances exist, but general [[factors]] have been identified. These include: clear [[evidence]] of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probable_cause probable cause]; the seriousness of the [[offense]] and likelihood of destruction of [[evidence]]; [[limitations]] on the search to minimize the intrusion only to preventing destruction of [[evidence]]; and clear indications of exigency.
+
Exigent circumstances may make a warrantless search [[constitutional]] if [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probable_cause probable cause] exists. The [[existence]] of exigent circumstances is a mixed question of [[law]] and [[fact]]. There is no [[absolute]] test for determining if exigent circumstances exist, but general [[factors]] have been identified. These include: clear [[evidence]] of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probable_cause probable cause]; the seriousness of the [[offense]] and likelihood of destruction of [[evidence]]; [[limitations]] on the search to minimize the intrusion only to preventing destruction of [[evidence]]; and clear indications of exigency.
  
Exigency may be determined by: [[degree]] of urgency involved; amount of time needed to get a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_(law) warrant]; whether [[evidence]] is about to be removed or destroyed; [[danger]] at the site; [[knowledge]] of the suspect that [[police]] are on his or her trail; and/or ready destructibility of the [[evidence]]. In determining the [[time]] [[necessary]] to obtain a warrant, a telephonic warrant should be considered. As electronic data may be altered or eradicated in seconds, in a factually compelling case the [[doctrine]] of exigent circumstances will support a warrantless seizure.
+
Exigency may be determined by: [[degree]] of urgency involved; amount of time needed to get a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_(law) warrant]; whether [[evidence]] is about to be removed or destroyed; [[danger]] at the site; [[knowledge]] of the suspect that [[police]] are on his or her trail; and/or ready destructibility of the [[evidence]]. In determining the [[time]] [[necessary]] to obtain a warrant, a telephonic warrant should be considered. As electronic data may be altered or eradicated in seconds, in a factually compelling case the [[doctrine]] of exigent circumstances will support a warrantless seizure.
  
Even in exigent circumstances, while a warrantless seizure may be permitted, a subsequent warrant to search may still be [[necessary]].[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exigency]
+
Even in exigent circumstances, while a warrantless seizure may be permitted, a subsequent warrant to search may still be [[necessary]].[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exigency]
  
 
[[Category: Law]]
 
[[Category: Law]]

Latest revision as of 01:07, 13 December 2020

Lighterstill.jpg

Exigency.jpg

Origin

French exigence, < Latin exigentia, < exigent-em, present participle of exigĕre (Urgent)

Definitions

b : a state of affairs that makes urgent demands <a leader must act in any sudden exigency>

Description

An exigent circumstance, in the American law of criminal procedure, allows law enforcement to enter a structure without a warrant, or if they have a "knock and announce" warrant, without knocking and waiting for refusal under certain circumstances. It must be a situation where people are in imminent danger, evidence faces imminent destruction, or a suspect will escape.

In the criminal procedure context, exigent circumstance means:

An emergency situation requiring swift action to prevent imminent danger to life or serious damage to property, or to forestall the imminent escape of a suspect, or destruction of evidence. There is no ready litmus test for determining whether such circumstances exist, and in each case the extraordinary situation must be measured by the facts known by officials.

Those circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry (or other relevant prompt action) was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of a suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating legitimate law enforcement efforts.

Exigent circumstances may make a warrantless search constitutional if probable cause exists. The existence of exigent circumstances is a mixed question of law and fact. There is no absolute test for determining if exigent circumstances exist, but general factors have been identified. These include: clear evidence of probable cause; the seriousness of the offense and likelihood of destruction of evidence; limitations on the search to minimize the intrusion only to preventing destruction of evidence; and clear indications of exigency.

Exigency may be determined by: degree of urgency involved; amount of time needed to get a warrant; whether evidence is about to be removed or destroyed; danger at the site; knowledge of the suspect that police are on his or her trail; and/or ready destructibility of the evidence. In determining the time necessary to obtain a warrant, a telephonic warrant should be considered. As electronic data may be altered or eradicated in seconds, in a factually compelling case the doctrine of exigent circumstances will support a warrantless seizure.

Even in exigent circumstances, while a warrantless seizure may be permitted, a subsequent warrant to search may still be necessary.[1]