Difference between revisions of "Tautology"

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with 'File:lighterstill.jpgright|frame ==Origin== Late Latin ''tautologia'', from Greek, from ''tautologos'' *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_c...')
 
m (Text replacement - "http://" to "https://")
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Origin==
 
==Origin==
 
Late Latin ''tautologia'', from [[Greek]], from ''tautologos''
 
Late Latin ''tautologia'', from [[Greek]], from ''tautologos''
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_century 1574]
+
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_century 1574]
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
 
*1 : needless [[repetition]] of an [[idea]], [[statement]], or [[word]]
 
*1 : needless [[repetition]] of an [[idea]], [[statement]], or [[word]]
 
:“A beginner who has just started” is a ''tautology''.
 
:“A beginner who has just started” is a ''tautology''.
 
==Description==
 
==Description==
'''Tautology''' (from [[Greek]] ''tauto'', "the same" and logos, "[[word]]/idea") is an unnecessary [[repetition]] of [[meaning]], using dissimilar words that effectively say the same thing (often originally from different languages). It is considered a [[fault]] of style and was defined by ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Dictionary_of_Modern_English_Usage A Dictionary of Modern English Usage]'' (Fowler) as "saying the same thing twice," if it is not apparently [[necessary]] for the entire meaning of a phrase to be repeated. If a part of the [[meaning]] is repeated in such a way that it appears as unintentional, or clumsy, then it may be described as ''tautology''. On the other hand, a repetition of meaning which improves the style of a piece of [[speech]] or [[writing]] is not necessarily described as ''tautology''. In evaluating [[worldviews]], logicians do not concern themselves that the premises are correct or not, but whether the conclusions derive logically.
+
'''Tautology''' (from [[Greek]] ''tauto'', "the same" and logos, "[[word]]/idea") is an unnecessary [[repetition]] of [[meaning]], using dissimilar words that effectively say the same thing (often originally from different languages). It is considered a [[fault]] of style and was defined by ''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Dictionary_of_Modern_English_Usage A Dictionary of Modern English Usage]'' (Fowler) as "saying the same thing twice," if it is not apparently [[necessary]] for the entire meaning of a phrase to be repeated. If a part of the [[meaning]] is repeated in such a way that it appears as unintentional, or clumsy, then it may be described as ''tautology''. On the other hand, a repetition of meaning which improves the style of a piece of [[speech]] or [[writing]] is not necessarily described as ''tautology''. In evaluating [[worldviews]], logicians do not concern themselves that the premises are correct or not, but whether the conclusions derive logically.
  
A rhetorical tautology is defined as a [[series]] of [[statements]] that form an [[argument]], whereby the statements are constructed in such a way that the [[truth]] of the [[proposition]] is guaranteed or that, by defining a dissimilar or synonymous term in terms of another self-referentially, the [[truth]] of the proposition or [[explanation]] cannot be disputed. Consequently, the statement conveys no useful [[information]] regardless of its length or [[complexity]] making it unfalsifiable. It is a way of formulating a [[description]] such that it masquerades as an explanation when the real reason for the [[phenomena]] cannot be independently derived. A rhetorical tautology should not be [[confused]] with a tautology in propositional logic, which by the precepts of empiricism is not falsifiable.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology_%28rhetoric%29]
+
A rhetorical tautology is defined as a [[series]] of [[statements]] that form an [[argument]], whereby the statements are constructed in such a way that the [[truth]] of the [[proposition]] is guaranteed or that, by defining a dissimilar or synonymous term in terms of another self-referentially, the [[truth]] of the proposition or [[explanation]] cannot be disputed. Consequently, the statement conveys no useful [[information]] regardless of its length or [[complexity]] making it unfalsifiable. It is a way of formulating a [[description]] such that it masquerades as an explanation when the real reason for the [[phenomena]] cannot be independently derived. A rhetorical tautology should not be [[confused]] with a tautology in propositional logic, which by the precepts of empiricism is not falsifiable.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology_%28rhetoric%29]
  
 
[[Category: Logic]]
 
[[Category: Logic]]

Latest revision as of 02:32, 13 December 2020

Lighterstill.jpg

Tautology clock.jpg

Origin

Late Latin tautologia, from Greek, from tautologos

Definition

“A beginner who has just started” is a tautology.

Description

Tautology (from Greek tauto, "the same" and logos, "word/idea") is an unnecessary repetition of meaning, using dissimilar words that effectively say the same thing (often originally from different languages). It is considered a fault of style and was defined by A Dictionary of Modern English Usage (Fowler) as "saying the same thing twice," if it is not apparently necessary for the entire meaning of a phrase to be repeated. If a part of the meaning is repeated in such a way that it appears as unintentional, or clumsy, then it may be described as tautology. On the other hand, a repetition of meaning which improves the style of a piece of speech or writing is not necessarily described as tautology. In evaluating worldviews, logicians do not concern themselves that the premises are correct or not, but whether the conclusions derive logically.

A rhetorical tautology is defined as a series of statements that form an argument, whereby the statements are constructed in such a way that the truth of the proposition is guaranteed or that, by defining a dissimilar or synonymous term in terms of another self-referentially, the truth of the proposition or explanation cannot be disputed. Consequently, the statement conveys no useful information regardless of its length or complexity making it unfalsifiable. It is a way of formulating a description such that it masquerades as an explanation when the real reason for the phenomena cannot be independently derived. A rhetorical tautology should not be confused with a tautology in propositional logic, which by the precepts of empiricism is not falsifiable.[1]